The Best Countertop Reverse Osmosis Systems We’ve Tested

🤝 Our content is written by humans, not AI robots. Learn More

The best countertop reverse osmosis systems are extremely high-performing and can reduce hundreds of impurities from water. They’re also highly efficient and waste less water than conventional RO systems, and are easy to install due to their plug-and-play designs.  

We conduct our own hands-on testing to obtain the data we need to review and compare water filters. All the RO systems in this guide were personally tested by Brian, the founder of Water Filter Guru, WQA Certified Water Specialist (CWS), and Certified Water Treatment Representative (CWR), who has been testing and reviewing water filters for 10+ years.

Our Testing & Selection Process

The 3 Best Countertop Reverse Osmosis Systems

ProductAquaTru
AquaTru
Waterdrop N1
Waterdrop N1
RKIN U1
RKIN U1
Bluevua ROPOT
Bluevua ROPOT
Simpure Y7P
Simpure Y7P
Score9.549.178.838.688.04
Price$449.00$299.00$749.95$454.00$369.99
CertificationsNSF 42, 53, 58, 401, and P473Not CertifiedNSF 58 (in progress)Not CertifiedNSF 58 (Materials Requirements Onnly)
Filter Capacity600 – 1,200 gallons550 – 1,600 gallons6, 12, 24 months538 / 1,076 / 260 gallons528 gallons
Cost per Gallon$0.11$0.09$0.08$0.27$0.10
WarrantyLifetime1 year1-year warranty & 1 year money-back guarantee1 year1 year
Read ReviewAquaTru reviewWaterdrop N1 reviewRKIN U1 reviewBluevua ROPOT review

AquaTru Performance

AquaTru scored the highest overall performance score out of any RO system we tested: 

  • The AquaTru Classic system received a score of 9.54 out of 10
  • The AquaTru Carafe got a slightly higher score of 9.57 due to its glass collection vessel (the Classic system collects water in a plastic vessel). 

These are two of the best scores our scoring system has ever awarded, and are currently higher than any other countertop RO system has obtained. 

Both systems use the same filter technology (the only difference is that the AquaTru Carafe’s filters are smaller), so both performed very similarly in our testing.

For reducing health-related contaminants in our water, the unit received a score of 9.90. It eliminated 100% of all contaminants with possible health effects, including lead, strontium, uranium, fluoride, molybdenum, and barium. It also got a 9.90 score for aesthetic contaminants because it reduced 100% chlorine in our water.

A standout performance feature of the AquaTru is that it’s IAPMO certified to NSF Standards 42, 53, 58, 401, and P473 for the reduction of all 83 contaminants that AquaTru claims it can reduce. Many of its competitors aren’t certified at all, and others are only certified to reduce a handful of contaminants. 

AquaTru also got the best design scores of any countertop RO unit we tested:

The Carafe version received a 10.00 (equal only to the Bluevua ROPOT, which also uses a glass collection carafe), and the Classic model earned a respectable 9.70.

We had no complaints about its component quality, and its IAMPO performance certification also incorporates a materials safety certification. Even better, it has an NSF 372 certification for lead-free design.  

AquaTru also did better than its competitors with its 4:1 recovery rate, meaning that only 1 gallon of water was wasted for every 4 gallons purified.

We awarded both AquaTru models we tested 10.00 and 9.75 scores for setup and maintenance.

We didn’t have to prime the filters, and the units arrived partially assembled. They both feature a display screen that notified us whenever a filter needed replacing, and the Classic unit’s ongoing cost of $0.11/ gallon was super affordable.

Even the Carafe model, which has smaller filters with shorter lifespans, has an affordable maintenance cost of $0.19/ gallon—although it’s not the absolute cheapest we’ve tested in terms of ongoing costs.

Brian getting filtered water from Aquatru

We think the AquaTru is the best countertop reverse osmosis system for folks who want a top-performing certified unit with the option for a remineralization upgrade. 

CriteriaResults
Overall Score9.54
Health Related Contaminants9.90
Aesthetic Related Contaminants9.90
Performance CertificationCertified for 100% of reduction claims
Filtration Rate0.04 GPM
Component QualityOutstanding
Component CertificationExceptional
SetupExceptional
Servicing RequirementsOutstanding
Costs$0.11/ gallon
Warranty Length1 year
ShippingFree shipping
Returns30 days

Waterdrop N1 Performance

The Waterdrop N1 received a 9.51 score for contaminant reduction. In our testing, it reduced 100% barium, chlorine, copper, lead, molybdenum, nitrate, phosphorous, strontium, sulfate, uranium, and zinc.

It reduced just over 93% fluoride, which was good, but not as impressive as the RO systems that eliminated this contaminant.

The N1 isn’t performance-certified, which was the main reason why its overall contaminant reduction score was lower than AquaTru’s.

We awarded the unit a score of 8.10 for design. Again, it didn’t quite match up to AquaTru here because it doesn’t have a materials safety certification, which pulled its score down. But in terms of design, feel and quality, it was no different from the AquaTru. It has a majority plastic design, and the components that the water comes into contact with are made from BPA-free Polypropylene (PP). 

Brian removing the water reservoir of Waterdrop N1

Setup and maintenance were two performance categories in which the Waterdrop N1 excelled, receiving 9.50 and 10.00 scores for each. Like the AquaTru, the N1 is a plug-and-play machine that comes with the filters pre-installed. We just rinsed and flushed the system a few times following instructions in the manual.

Replacing the filters was easy and didn’t require any special knowledge. The N1 also has a screen that displays filter change reminders, and its ongoing cost is slightly lower than AquaTru’s at just $0.09/ gallon. A unique feature of this system that made maintenance easier was its internal UV light. This sterilizes the purified water holding tank, so it doesn’t have to be taken apart to be cleaned. 

Installing Waterdrop N1 CF filter

We recommend the Waterdrop N1 to anyone who wants a more affordable alternative to the AquaTru, with very similar contaminant reduction and efficiency data but no option to upgrade to a remineralization filter. 

CriteriaResults
Overall Score9.17
Health Related Contaminants9.90
Aesthetic Related Contaminants9.90
Performance CertificationNot certified for any reduction claims
Filtration Rate0.1 GPM
Component QualityFair
Component CertificationNot certified
SetupOutstanding
Servicing RequirementsExceptional
Costs$0.09/ gallon
Warranty Length1 year
ShippingFree shipping to lower 48
Returns30 days

RKIN U1 Performance

The RKIN U1 secured a 9.00 score for contaminant reduction. It eliminated 100% chlorine, copper, fluoride, lead, molybdenum, uranium, and zinc, and greatly reduced barium, nitrate, and sulfate.

But its overall score was impacted by the fact that strontium increased from 0.108 PPM to 2.42 PPM in our filtered water, most likely from the remineralization filter. The unit also lacks a performance certification. 

The system got good scores in the setup and maintenance categories: 10.00 and 9.75 respectively. The U1 is also a plug-and-play system, and it has a flush function that you can activate by pressing a button, so we didn’t have to manually prime or flush the filters. Our estimated ongoing cost for the system was $0.0809/ gallon, making it the most affordable to maintain in the long run, despite having the highest upfront cost. 

Unboxing the RKIN U1

The U1’s filtration rate let it down slightly – it was just 0.07 GPM (AquaTru’s measured at 0.08 GPM, while the Waterdrop N1’s was better at 0.1 GPM). It also has a 1:1 efficiency ratio, so it’s not quite as efficient as the AquaTru or N1. 

In the design category, we were pleased with the U1’s component quality, but it was lacking a materials safety certification. 

In our opinion, the U1 is the best choice for folks who want the leading high-tech RO system with a host of perks and add-ons that are rarely found all in one unit. If you use a lot of hot water and want to purify it easily, the U1 makes sense for you. 

CriteriaResults
Overall Score8.86
Health Related Contaminants9.30
Aesthetic Related Contaminants9.90
Performance CertificationNot certified for any reduction claims
Filtration Rate0.07 GPM
Component QualityOutstanding
Component CertificationNot certified
SetupExceptional
Servicing RequirementsExceptional
Costs$0.08/gallon
Warranty Length1 year
ShippingFree shipping on orders over $175 to lower 48 states
Returns30 days

Related Review: Top Ranked Apartment Water Filters

How it Performed 

In our performance testing, Bluevua eliminated all uranium—which was detected in concentrations exceeding the Tap Score HGL—but it only reduced fluoride (also exceeding the HGL) by 83%.

The system also completely removed nitrate, chlorine, sulfate, copper, and molybdenum by 100%, and reduced barium by 77% and strontium by 75%. 

It performed well, but we’ve seen more thorough contaminant reduction from other countertop RO systems. Plus, it’s not performance certified, despite Bluevua misleadingly claiming to have an “Official Third Party Certification” and using its WQA Gold Seal certificate (for lead-free design only) in a way that suggests this is for contaminant reduction. This landed it a slightly lower score of 8.23 for contaminant reduction. 

On a more positive note, the remineralization filter appeared to do its job well, as we only saw an 86% reduction of calcium and a 60% reduction of magnesium (rather than 100%).

Plus, the pH of our water increased from 7.1 to 9.0, likely due to the addition of alkaline-enhancing minerals. 

The system’s 0.06 GPM filtration rate is pretty standard for a countertop RO system using an electric pump, earning it a score of 7.50,  and its 2:1 efficiency ratio is good, although not the best we’ve seen.

The UV purification light is a nice touch and protects the unit from bacteria buildup in the filters, but it should still only be used with treated, potable water.

Bluevua ROPOT at the countertop

Our Thoughts

There were a few features of the Bluevua ROPOT system that we enjoyed. 

The system feels sturdy, with a polyamide and polypropylene plastic design, and we were pleased to see at least one certification: NSF/ANSI 372, awarded by the WQA for lead-free design.

We appreciated the convenience of the water collecting directly in the glass carafe, so we didn’t have to stand around manually dispensing it ourselves. 

Bluevua Ropot Design Material

And speaking of the glass carafe, Bluevua is one of the only manufacturers (alongside AquaTru) to use a glass collection vessel, which you’ll probably prefer if you don’t want to expose your purified water to microplastics. This earned it a design score of 10.00. 

Setup was quick and easy, and the system received another 10.00 in this category, with no unexpected tasks for a plug-and-play countertop RO system. We also found it easy to stick to the maintenance schedule, with the display screen notifying when filter changes were required. 

Bluevua’s total maintenance spend came to $0.27/ gallon, making it one of the more “expensive” on-counter reverse osmosis systems we’ve still tested, but still very affordable even compared to non-RO filters. Its overall maintenance score came in at 9.75.

We think the Bluevua ROPOT(UV) is ideal for folks who specifically want a system with built-in UV purification that collects water in a glass carafe.

CriteriaResults
Overall Score8.68
Health Related Contaminants8.40
Aesthetic Related Contaminants9.90
Performance CertificationNot Certified
Filtration Rate0.06 GPM
Component QualityExceptional
Component CertificationNSF 372
SetupExceptional
Servicing RequirementsOutstanding
Costs$0.27/ gallon
Warranty Length1 year
ShippingFree Shipping to continental US
Returns30 days

Testing Notes

In our testing, the Simpure Y7P actually got the lowest overall performance score of all countertop RO systems we’ve tested so far: 8.04.

This was largely due to a number of design elements that let it down (we’ll discuss later), as well as a few issues with its contaminant reduction performance. 

Starting with the positives, the Y7P did a great job of completely eliminating fluoride and uranium (both detected above the HGL), as well as barium, copper, chlorine, strontium, and sulfate. It also greatly reduced nitrate by 78%.

But there were a couple of reasons why the system’s contaminant reduction score was brought down to 8.23: 

  1. First, there’s no remineralization filter (and no optional upgrade either—you can only choose one of Simpure’s other products that do have this feature). As a result, our purified water was highly deficient in magnesium, calcium, and sodium, and had an acidic pH of 6.3 (reduced from 7.1).
  2. Second, the system hasn’t been performance certified, putting it behind many of the other systems that have. Misleadingly, SimPure claims that the system has been “SGS tested and certified”, making us believe that SGS is an industry accepted certification body (it isn’t).

The unit’s 0.5 GPM filtration rate earned it a score of 7.00, making it one of the slowest of a slow bunch, but its 4:1 pure-to-wastewater ratio is a huge redeeming factor. It continuously circulates water through the filters until the inlet tank is nearly empty, reducing wastewater production as much as possible.

Our Feedback

We were generally pleased with the look and feel of the Y7P system. Design-wise, it’s no different from other countertop RO systems, with an electric pump and built-in filter cartridges. It’s also certified for materials requirements only under Standard 58 by the NSF.

In terms of its appearance and functionality, we found the system similar to Waterdrop N1, which, at the time of writing this, is around $150 cheaper. 

There were, however, a few design issues that we noted, bringing its score down to 8.50.

  • First, having a small pure water tank was a hassle because we’d have to dispense all the water from it every time it got full if we wanted to purify all the water from the unfiltered water tank. 
  • Plus, the unit beeps annoyingly for around 20 seconds to let you know when there’s a shortage of pure water, as well as when you remove the unfiltered water tank to fill it up.
  • We also noted that the cupholder that goes under the dispenser spout is made from cheap plastic.
  • And finally, we found that the lid that covers the unfiltered water tank slips down and gets in your way when you’re trying to install the tank after filling it up.

Despite being a plug-and-play system like the other RO filters we reviewed, SimPure got a low score of 7.00 for setup. This was because the filter flushing process takes up to 2 hours due to the small holding volume of the internal pure water tank compared to the unfiltered water tank. 

We had to wait for the pure water tank to be filled, then manually flush it. Then we had to wait for it to fill again, then manually flush it. This was repeated again and again until the unfiltered water tank was emptied and needed to be refilled.

The unit’s maintenance score was also brought down to 8.50 because we’ll have to repeat this annoying priming process every time we replace a filter—despite the Y7P’s overall maintenance cost being attractively low at just $0.10/ gallon.

We don’t think any of these issues are dealbreakers, and if you’re not bothered about remineralization or a few design issues, the SimPure Y7P’s impressive contaminant reduction performance might be exactly what you’re looking for.

CriteriaResults
Overall Score8.04
Health Related Contaminants8.40
Aesthetic Related Contaminants9.90
Performance CertificationNot Certified
Filtration Rate0.05 GPM
Component QualityBelow Average
Component CertificationExceptional
SetupWeak
Servicing RequirementsWeak
Costs$0.10/ gallon
Warranty Length1 year
ShippingFree shipping to continental US 
ReturnsOnly available for certain conditions – No trial period/ guarantee
  • brian headshot
    President & CEO, CWS, CWR

    Brian Campbell, a WQA Certified Water Specialist (CWS) and Certified Water Treatment Representative (CWR) with 5+ years of experience, helps homeowners navigate the world of water treatment. After honing his skills at Hach Company, he founded his business to empower homeowners with the knowledge and tools to achieve safe, healthy water. Brian's tested countless devices, from simple pitchers to complex systems, helping his readers find the perfect fit for their unique needs.

Scroll to Top