The Hands-Down Best Water Filters for Microplastics of 2025

🤝 Our content is written by humans, not AI robots. Learn More

Our experts have tested dozens of water filters using our battery of 8 objective & data-driven tests. We’ve evaluated the best water filters for microplastics removal using our performance-based scoring factors, which are weighted to determine an overall score. We then used these scores to determine the best water filters for addressing microplastics. 

With its superior reverse osmosis performance, certification for microplastics removal, highly efficient performance, and glass carafe for water collection, the AquaTru Carafe is our top choice for removing microplastics from drinking water.

Our Testing & Selection Process

The 4 Best Water Filters that Remove Microplastics

ProductAquaTru Carafe
AquaTru Carafe
AquaTru
AquaTru Classic
British Berkefeld
British Berkefeld
AquaTru
Brita Elite
Score9.579.548.646.59
Price$349.00+$449.00+$358$40.99
CertificationsNSF/ANSI 42, 53, 58, 401 & 372NSF/ANSI 42, 53, 58, 401 & 372NSF/ANSI 42, 53, 401 & 372NSF/ANSI 42, 53
Filter Capacity300 – 1,200 gallons600 – 1,200 gallons800 gallons120 gallons
Cost per Gallon$0.19$0.11$0.09$0.17
Warranty1 year1 yearLifetime1 year
Read ReviewAquatru Carafe reviewAquatru Classic reviewBritish Berkefeld reviewBrita Elite review

AquaTru Carafe Performance

Although we have not yet tested specifically for microplastics reduction performance, we still conducted our own water quality testing for other, more easily detectable contaminants. 

For its ability to reduce 100% of all health-related contaminants in our water, including fluoride, lead, uranium, barium, and molybdenum, we awarded the AquaTru a 9.90 in this category. It also eliminated 100% chlorine, which earned it another score of 9.90 for addressing aesthetic contaminants. 

Conventional reverse osmosis systems waste up to 4 gallons of water per 1 gallon purified, so recovery rates are an important consideration when we’re reviewing reverse osmosis systems. The AquaTru Carafe has a 4:1 efficiency ratio—meaning only 1 gallon is wasted per 4 gallons purified—which makes it one of the most efficient reverse osmosis systems we’ve ever tested

Design-wise, we think the AquaTru Carafe will appeal to a lot of people. It’s smaller than the AquaTru Countertop RO System, and it collects purified water in a glass vessel, so there’s no concern about microplastics leaching. This combined with its certification for materials safety and NSF 372 certification for lead-free design earned it the highest design score of 10.00. 

Aquatru carafe clean and dirty water tanks labels

The system’s plug-and-play machine also made setup easy, with no invasive under-sink installation, earning it another 10.00 for installation. Maintenance was equally easy and surprisingly affordable, although slightly more expensive than the full-size AquaTru system due to the shorter filter lifespan. We scored the Carafe a 9.75 for maintenance.

We think the AquaTru Carafe is the ideal solution for anyone who wants a performance-certified filter to eliminate microplastics and all the other impurities in their water, with no risk of reintroducing plastic particles post-filtration

CriteriaResults
Overall Score9.57
Health Related Contaminants9.90
Aesthetic Related Contaminants9.90
Performance CertificationCertified for 100% of reduction claims
Filtration Rate0.3 GPM
Component QualityExceptional
Component CertificationCertified
SetupExceptional
Servicing RequirementsOutstanding
Costs$0.19/ gallon
Warranty Length1 year
ShippingFree shipping
Returns30 days

Performance Stats

Since the AquaTru Classic uses the same filters as the Carafe, it delivered the same exceptional contaminant reduction performance, eliminating all impurities with health effects detected in our water and earning it an overall contaminant reduction score of 9.91. 

It also has the same high-efficiency pure-to-wastewater ratio of 4:1, and the same certifications for materials safety and lead-free design. Its design score was slightly lower than the Carafe’s  (9.70) due to its plastic tank, but it has the advantage of a larger purified water holding capacity of 2.7 liters (around 0.7 US gallons) compared to the Carafe’s 1.9 liters (around 0.5 gallons).

aquatru clean water reservoir

The system has the same simple plug-and-play setup and low-cost maintenance, with a slightly lower cost-per-gallon of just $0.11. It received the same scores as the Carafe in these categories: 10.00 for installation and 9.75 for maintenance.

The AquaTru Classic makes sense if you want all of AquaTru’s performance benefits with a system that has a larger water-holding capacity and a longer filter lifespan. 

A Word On AquaTru’s Storage Tank

The AquaTru Classic’s purified water storage tank is made from Tritan, a form of plastic that’s BPA- and BPS-free.

Brian removing the water tank of AquaTru Countertop RO System
CriteriaResults
Overall Score9.54
Health Related Contaminants9.90
Aesthetic Related Contaminants9.90
Performance CertificationCertified for 100% of reduction claims
Filtration Rate0.04 GPM
Component QualityOutstanding
Component CertificationExceptional
SetupExceptional
Servicing RequirementsOutstanding
Costs$0.11/ gallon
Warranty Length1 year
ShippingFree shipping
Returns30 days

How it Performed

The British Berkefeld’s Ultra Sterasyl filter received an 8.56 score for contaminant reduction. Our test data showed that it had reduced 100% uranium, chlorine, copper, and molybdenum, along with 70% nitrate and trace reductions of strontium and barium. 

The filter’s performance score was pulled down by its inability to remove fluoride—but given that British Berkefeld sells separate filters for this purpose, this wasn’t something we’d expected it to do. 

We awarded the British Berkefeld unit a score of 10.00 for design, determined by its sturdy 304 stainless steel build and its NSF 372 certification for lead-free design

British Berkefeld Filter at the countertop

It’s another great option if you want to limit your filtered water’s exposure to microplastics, especially when you’re specifically looking for a filter that can reduce these contaminants. It also uses a stainless steel spigot, so (unlike many of its competitors) water doesn’t come into contact with plastic as it’s dispensed out of the tank. 

The unit’s setup and maintenance processes are nice and easy, earning it 9.00 and 9.25 scores in these categories respectively.

We recommend the British Berkefeld with the Ultra Sterasyl filter to folks who want a certified, reliable solution for removing microplastics and many other impurities from their water supply, without the cost, water waste, or multiple filter change requirements of a reverse osmosis system.

CriteriaResults
Overall Score8.64
Health Related Contaminants8.50
Aesthetic Related Contaminants9.90
Performance CertificationCertified for 28% of reduction claims
Filtration Rate0.3 GPM
Component QualityExceptional
Component CertificationNSF Certified
SetupExcellent
Servicing RequirementsGood
Costs$0.09/ gal
Warranty LengthLifetime
ShippingFree Shipping on orders over $99 to the contiguous US
Returns30 days

Our Notes on Brita’s Performance

The Brita Elite received a relatively low score of 4.29 in our performance testing—but this was primarily because it didn’t effectively address some of the specific contaminants detected in our treated groundwater, including fluoride, uranium, nitrate, molybdenum, strontium, and sulfate. 

Good to Know: If you have city water, it may not contain these contaminants, which is why I always recommend testing your water to find out what it contains before you start shopping for a water filter. 

The Elite filter did do a great job at reducing 100% barium and 97% copper in our water, as well as 100% chlorine, and its performance certifications were a redeeming factor (as well as its WQA certification to Standard 401, it also has IAPMO certifications to reduce VOCs and PFOA/PFOS.

We awarded the filter an 8.80 score for design, based on its sturdy, heavy-duty plastic construction and its certification for material safety as a component of its NSF performance certifications.

It also received great setup and maintenance scores—9.50 and 9.75, respectively—because the filter requires no lengthy priming process and has a long 6-month lifespan, reducing the unit’s ongoing maintenance spend. 

What You Should Know About Brita’s Plastic Design

Brita’s pitchers are made from polypropylene plastic and SAN. In my research, I found a study that looked into the leaching of microplastics from different plastics, including polypropylene, and concluded that microplastic particles can disintegrate from the original plastic materials “under suitable conditions”.

holding brita elite filter next to pitcher

What does that tell us? Microplastics can potentially leach from polypropylene plastics into water. However:

  • Conditions that promote leaching include UV exposure, water currents, and the presence of biofilm, all of which you should be able to avoid if you store your Brita pitcher away from direct sunlight, keep it clean, and replace the filter as advised by the manufacturer. 
  • This testing hasn’t been specifically conducted on Brita’s unique pitcher design, so it doesn’t confirm that leaching will occur from the Brita pitcher just because it uses polypropylene. 

I wanted to mention this study here so you have the knowledge to make the most informed decision. Ultimately, I can neither confirm or deny whether your water is at risk of microplastics recontamination from any of Brita’s water filter pitchers because I haven’t tested this myself. 

Brita used to sell a glass pitcher, but it isn’t currently available to the US market. So, you’ll have to weigh up whether or not you’re comfortable storing your filtered water in a plastic vessel.

Note: You could limit the risk of re-contamination by transferring the filtered water into a non-plastic container as soon as possible. 
CriteriaResults
Overall Score6.59
Health Related Contaminants3.50
Aesthetic Related Contaminants9.90
Performance CertificationCertified for 45% of reduction claims
Filtration Rate2.92 GPH
Component QualityGood
Component CertificationCertified
SetupOutstanding
Servicing RequirementsOutstanding
Costs$0.17/ gallon
Warranty Length1 year
ShippingFree shipping on orders over $35
Returns30 days

Frequently Asked Questions

Which water filter removes microplastics?

A variety of water filters remove microplastics, including under-sink filters, whole home filters, countertop filters, and portable filters that fit the bill. As long as the filter media can target very small contaminants (down to 1-2 microns), it should, in theory, offer some level of microplastics removal.

Do Brita filters remove microplastics?

Yes, but only the Brita Elite filter has been tested to remove microplastics.

Does ZeroWater remove microplastics?

Yes, the ZeroWater faucet filter can reduce microplastics, but the ZeroWater pitcher cannot.

What is the best water filter pitcher for microplastics?

In our opinion, the best water filter pitcher for microplastics is the Brita Elite filter – which is the only one officially certified for microplastics reduction.

Why can’t we filter microplastics?

The reason why it’s a struggle to filter microplastics with a standard water filter is that microplastics are small enough to slip through the pores of these filters. It is possible to filter microplastics, though – you just need a specialized filtration method or a filter with small enough pores to trap microplastics.

Microplastics in drinking water

How long does it take to filter microplastics out of water?

It takes a couple of minutes to just a couple of seconds to filter microplastics out of water, depending on the filtration method you use. Water filters connected to your water line, like whole home point of entry filters and under-sink filters, provide instant microplastics filtration. Countertop units like water filter pitchers and reverse osmosis systems take 2-15 minutes to filter microplastics on average.

How effective are microplastic filters?

Microplastics filters have the potential to be highly effective – but not all filters offer an equal performance. Some filters, like the reverse osmosis systems remove virtually all microplastics from water, as well as tens of other contaminants, so they’re our top recommended filters for this purpose.

About Our Experts

This guide was produced by Brian Campbell, WaterFilterGuru.com’s Founder and Water Filter Specialist. Brian conducted the research required for his reviews and was able to test all the shortlisted filters in his own home. You can learn more about Brian in the author bio below.

  • brian headshot
    President & CEO, CWS, CWR

    Brian Campbell, a WQA Certified Water Specialist (CWS) and Certified Water Treatment Representative (CWR) with 5+ years of experience, helps homeowners navigate the world of water treatment. After honing his skills at Hach Company, he founded his business to empower homeowners with the knowledge and tools to achieve safe, healthy water. Brian's tested countless devices, from simple pitchers to complex systems, helping his readers find the perfect fit for their unique needs.

7 thoughts on “The Hands-Down Best Water Filters for Microplastics of 2025”

  1. Avatar for Brian Campbell

    How can I remove nanoplastics that is copiously PRODUCED just be combining oxidative water disinfection by ClO2 and HClO and feeding it through HDPE or other plastic pipes?

    For filter materials, this is even more intersting, as fine structures will disintegrate faster and give off nanoplastics.
    So can you name a filter that is buffering the 0.2ppm ClO2 and 0.2ppm HClO that our normal municipal water “provides”, by some liquid anti-oxidant eg Vitamin-C, before feeding it through the filter structure?
    OR
    Can you name a filter that is totally consisting of compatible material :
    – PTFE or other “forever” plastics like Viton
    – ceramics
    – stainless steel (anti-corrosion equipped, so at least “sea water resistant”)
    – glass

    NO HDPE, PVC, PE, .. is able to withstand ANY inorganic antiseptic used for water purification in the long run, and since no-one wants to measure nano plastic, we should take care that we do not PRODUCE it in excess in the (needed) attemt to filtrate water.

    Best would be to use UV-C at the well and in pump stations, and then again in the house’s water filter station.
    This woul increase lifetime of municipal and perhaps house installation multifold, from 30yrs to perhaps some hundred 😉

    My motivation to filtrate nano plastics out is the realisation that we ingest a zoo of organo-chemistry that is relevant for immune system, cancer driving, hormon-system altering, sterility-evoking and speed-ageing questions.

    See p. 14 eg. on this publication that touches longevity of pipes, but not the toxicity of degradation producs.
    https://www.researchgate.net/publication/352220536_Degradation_of_Polymer_Elastomer_Exposed_to_Chlorinated_Water-A_Review/fulltext/60bf730ea6fdcc5128121d53/Degradation-of-Polymer-Elastomer-Exposed-to-Chlorinated-Water-A-Review.pdf?origin=publication_detail

    How could a home kit for determining nano participation be devices for small cost?
    I find the nano particles by calcification or other processes that have some saturated solution in between very promising also for determining the content, yet they all offer filter capabilities in the nm range we need.

    Alll the best!

  2. Avatar for Brian Campbell
    Cheryl Dunn Bychek

    I have, for years, consumed ionized alkaline water from my Kangen water system. I’m wondering if putting that water into the referenced pitcher filtration system would change the ionization or alkalinity of the water I’m drinking or whether it would enhance my experience by further purifying the water I drink–specifically interested in eliminating microplastics. Your thoughts?

    1. Avatar for Brian Campbell
      Brian Campbell

      I’m honestly not sure what impact the filter would have on the ionized water from a Kangen system. This would be a great idea for a project to test.

  3. Avatar for Brian Campbell

    In this report you state:
    1. “Does ZeroWater remove microplastics? Yes, ZeroWater filters up to 99.9% of microplastics from drinking water. We think this pitcher is a worthy contender, but it hasn’t made our list of the best microplastics filters because there are other water filter pitchers that are more capable when it comes to removing contaminants in general.”

    I’D LIKE TO KNOW: which ZeroWater filter you tested; the pitcher or ??? If you tested the Pitcher which model as they have lots of them

    2. “Do Brita filters remove microplastics?
    No. While Brita filters might remove a few larger microplastics particles, you can’t rely on a Brita filter to remove all microplastics from your water, and Brita doesn’t advertise its filters as being capable of microplastics removal.

    I’D LIKE TO KNOW: if you tested the Brita Elite filter because lots of sources say the new Elite filter does remove Microplastics.

    1. Avatar for Brian Campbell
      Brian Campbell

      Great questions!

      1. We’ve used a few different ZeroWater products, but they all use the same filter cartridge. It’s one filter that fits in all the different sizes of vessels (pitchers, dispensers, etc.)

      2. Great catch! You are right, the Brita Elite filter has been tested to reduce 99.6% of microplastic particles 0.5-1 µm. Check their recent performance datasheets here https://www.brita.com/performance-data/

    1. Avatar for Brian Campbell
      Brian Campbell

      According to ZeroWater customer service, their filters have been tested to reduce 99% of microplastics. All ZeroWater vessels (pitchers and dispensers) use the same filter cartridge.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top